Future of Chromium on Windows Vista/7 NT 6.x - Potential Forks

Chrome, Brave, Vivaldi, Chredge, Chromium, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Ryan
Eclectic Owner
 

Posts: 137
Joined: 30 May 2021, 01:26
Has thanked: 95 times
Been thanked: 67 times
Contact:
United States of America

Future of Chromium on Windows Vista/7 NT 6.x - Potential Forks

Post by Ryan »

Chrome is slated to drop 7 and 8 support starting with v. 110, in February 2023.
Source: Sunsetting support for Windows 7 / 8/8.1 in early 2023

Brave, being the wholly independent browsing experience, outside of Google's umbrella :D , predictably followed suite with a similar announcement shortly thereafter: Sunsetting support for Windows 7 and 8/8.1

Now, given the relatively open nature of Chromium, it's quite probable a Windows 7-targetted fork will surface as this situation develops. For context, Chromium is currently being built by enthusiasts for OS X Lion. Bookmark this topic and check back periodically, as the information contained will be updated as this situation evolves.

With Windows being in a relatively static state from NT 6.x onward, the prospect of a fork sanitized of Windows 10-centric requirements is far more promising than the browser drought that struck XP a number of years ago. It is worth adding that great progress has been made toward getting modern Chromium on XP. Numerous repacks of Chinese-developed Chromium browsers with English language localization and sanitation of telemetry exist, maintained here by our own fellow forum members. These do work, but are dependent upon very closed sourced eastern companies, with reliance on enthusiasts to sanitize them for safe usage.

Fork candidates:
Thorium Browser is currently built for Linux and Windows. Its primary goal is to improve performance on some systems, building with AVX, etc. The developer seeks to maintain a Windows 7-specific build, one without the need for AVX. Builds are now available! This project shows great promise, and is nevertheless worth a look. Windows GitHub
Fairly close to vanilla Chrome, with some minor facelifts and feature set changes done. This fork supported Windows XP and Vista for some time after Google sunsetted these systems, but ultimately failed to keep these variants updated for long.
...................................................................................

Some closing advice:

i would advise against using official Google Chrome, on any platform, and insist instead you try a community Chromium build. This comes with a number of perks as opposed to bone-stock Chrome.
  • For one, the pesky auto updating agent is not included. This greatly frees up system resources when the browser is closed, as Chrome constantly runs a background service to update the browser and submit statistics, even when it appears the browser is not running!
  • Fewer nags about operating system support. It is quite likely that if a Windows 7-friendly community build of Chromium surfaces, it could take some time to come to fruition. While a Chrome version temporarily frozen on a specific build is quite usable, expect Google to go out of their way to drive you bananas. In more extreme cases, versions have been bricked, rendering it completely unusable. Such was the case with Mac OS X 10.9.
  • Privacy. While some community builds of Chromium provide Google Sync keys to sync your browser, just like Chrome, less data is collected about you when signed out of Sync.
My Chromium browsers of choice are Thorium and Chromium builds from here.

Lastly. If your workflow permits, I would recommend switching to Firefox. It's a good deal more customizable than the Chromes, with extensive theming options available thanks to userchrome projects like this one here. Community rebuilds of Firefox for legacy platforms have also proven to be less sparse than their Chromium counterparts, evident by Feodor2's MyPal68, or the Pale Moon project, maintained by RoyTam1 as New Moon for XP/Vista users.
Image
(Precision 3610) Xeon 2667 V2 | 32 GB RAM | EVGA GTX 970 SC | SU650 240 GB (Vista Exkern) | 840 Pro 256 GB (Vista Ultimate/10 IoT) | 8 TB storage
(Latitude E6530) i7-3740qm | 16 GB RAM | HD 4000 | 870 EVO 500 GB (Vista Ultimate/10 IoT) |2 TB storage
User avatar
win32
Kernel Extenders
 

Posts: 29
Joined: 18 Jun 2021, 21:42
Has thanked: 8 times
Been thanked: 23 times
Canada

Re: Future of Chromium on Windows Vista/7 NT 6.x - Potential Forks

Post by win32 »

I added a very early change to the implementation of job objects to the Vista extended kernel. This allowed Chromium 110 to run with --no-sandbox: Image

Opera 96 pre-releases can also run with --no-sandbox, even without the change to job objects. More functions were added to Chromium 111 so it will take a little while before I can get that up and running.
User avatar
blueclouds8666
Developers
 

Posts: 9
Joined: 04 Feb 2023, 11:18
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 8 times
Contact:
Micronesia

Re: Future of Chromium on Windows Vista/7 NT 6.x - Potential Forks

Post by blueclouds8666 »

The developers behind Opera Browser seem to be keen into supporting Windows 7 and 8 for a while more "as long as it doesn't require a lot of maintenance". The latest version of their browser also doesn't have that annoying warning message about the end of support so that already tell us something. This is a closed-source variant of chromium, but it is still interesting to see this.

https://forums.opera.com/topic/59360/opera-96-developer/8
Post Reply

Return to “Chrome/Chromium”

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests